Skip to main content

The Man Who Had All The Luck. A Fable by Arthur Miller. Dir Sean Holmes. Donmar on tour, April 2008

Written in 1940, Miller’s play reached Broadway in 1944, closed after four performances, and knocked his career sideways. It must have been way before its time, because this play about a young man having it all while those around him fail and flounder is superb. Staged in 1944, post-depression, perhaps it was too realistic. Seeing the play today, it is about fate, acceptance, and philosophy, and sits comfortably with our modern understanding of psychological self-doubt and anxiety.

Western neuroses recur about why some of us have wealth and success and some have nothing, locally and globally. Miller’s play questions how much control we have over our own destinies, and what effect we have when we try to force events. From a go-with-the-flow attitude to make-it-happen determination, The Man Who Had All The Luck suggests a combination of the two.

David Beeves is a cheerful, self-taught motor mechanic with a small repair shop in Michigan. In love with his childhood sweetheart, all he wants is to marry Hester … but the only obstacle to his happiness is her father. In a key scene, Hester’s father forbids David from seeing her again, and tells David he is a ‘lost soul,’ seeming to damn him. The curse is David’s sense of being unworthy.

David gets his heart’s desire. Throughout the play he questions his right to happiness; is he good enough for Hester; is he a good enough mechanic? In short, does he deserve his happiness? Blessed with good fortune, it almost seems as though his luck has a supernatural quality to it. When a highly skilled visitor appears in his repair shop at four in the morning and repairs a complicated problem it feels as though an angel has come.

David becomes increasingly twitchy and nervous about his successes, the more so as the people around him suffer. His guilt and shame threaten to consume him, to destroy his sanity and his marriage. Convinced that all his luck will have to be paid for, he cannot enjoy the pleasures life has given him and he expects catastrophe to strike.

His lack of self-awareness and self-knowledge make him seem an uncomplicated fellow but David is warm-hearted, sensible and hard-working. He thinks things through, doesn’t take risks, is honest and fair. It takes a near calamity for him to understand that these qualities are enough for him to have earned his good life. He finally understands that he is worthy of all he has.

Today is a good time to have revived this play about contentment. The Donmar Warehouse have put on a terrific production with a great set, fabulous lighting, a large and excellent cast, and created a riveting show. Hester could tone down just a bit, so not to appear too hysterical - this distracts from David’s sinister descent into madness which is harrowing enough. Otherwise, highly recommended for fine acting and great quality from start to finish.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Running ‘till your nipples bleed

An email from a friend of mine arrives; she complains that, at work, she is routinely subjected to gruesome accounts of female colleagues’ intimate medical procedures and gynaecological problems. I am all commiseration because I, too, have had years of listening to workplace chats about periods, childbirth and sex lives. Oh please. Later, I wander off for a walk in the early evening sunshine and it is so silent and so beautiful that I flop down on the grass and lay awhile gazing out over the rolling fields, and the mouth of the river, and fall into a reverie. Two men pass by. A few minutes later sounds of women’s talk float nearer and, by the time the two females of the species draw level with me, I have risen up from my deliciously recumbent position in the meadow, alert and tense, something like a meerkat. “I do feel for her. Going down that IVF route is such an emotional roller coaster. I was never prepared for how terrible it was going to be.” I remain frozen in my meerkat position...

OLD JOY. Dir Kelly Reichardt. 2005

Dropout Kurt arrives in town and calls up his old friend, earnest father-to-be Mark to suggest a camping trip out in the forest, away from the city. They haven’t seen each other for some time and the film suggests a desire for intimacy as well as a quest for peace. Something of a lost soul, Kurt is emotional and, at times, to be pitied. He lives outside society, in a world of new age type retreats and travels, which seem to have left him out on the margins. In contrast, Mark has a home and a pregnant partner, and tunes his car radio in to phone-ins with much loud chat about the state of society in America but he seems only half alive. They drive out of town, with the camera as passenger, which gazes out of the car window while a gorgeous soundtrack by Yo La Tengo sets a mellow mood. The use of extended silence makes me a little uneasy; it’s hard to get away from memories of Deliverance, and a sense of apprehension. In the city, the glass of the car windows insulates us...

Ian McEwan. Amsterdam. London: QPD, 1998

McEwan’s novel about ambition, personal betrayal and revenge features Clive, a modern composer trying to complete a major orchestral work, his friend Vernon, an editor trying to save his ailing newspaper, and Garmony, an unscrupulous right-wing politician on the rise. In common, all three have, in previous years, been lovers of recently dead Molly. They meet at her funeral and the story follows the next few weeks of the men’s lives. Vernon and Clive act as one another’s conscience, each infuriating the other. Which is more important, honesty, friendship and trust or Vernon’s newspaper and Clive’s symphony? The novel presents the difficulties of balancing personal and public morality, the importance of private shame and public reputation, the conflict between taking a moral decision for the greater good, or putting first ones own desires. Not just a simple exposé of a politician with a vulnerable side, Amsterdam is full of double standards and surprises, and takes a long, cynical look a...