Skip to main content

CASINO ROYALE. Dir Martin Campbell. 2006.

Casino Royale


Wow! This Bond film is intelligent and has real integrity. Daniel Craig is spot on as Bond, and gets a believable character across on screen, even – dare I say it – overtaking Connery, the ultimate Bond. He fits the role perfectly, and is tough and tender, the perfect combination for manhood...

Where Craig has the advantage is in an updated, well-written script by Purvis and Wade, incorporating current themes of terrorism and attempted spy poisoning. The bad guy, Le Chiffre, is strange without being ludicrous, and the screenplay does without the usual schoolboy humour, and without the naughty schoolboy antics with Q, who does not appear at all in this film. Miss Moneypenny is also absent. She is unnecessary because this Bond gets to develop a real emotional response to a believable woman, with whom he has a meaningful relationship. Bond does not have to contend with ridiculous gadgets, like exploding pens and wristwatches, yes I know they are really used by the secret service, but they strike audiences as pretty far fetched. Instead, the screenplay relies on Craig’s physicality, and the film is a celebration of masculinity. Craig is stacked, powerful and fast. The opening chase of a bomb maker has them both (and brilliant stunt men obviously) running, leaping, hurling themselves off and through things, throwing punches and getting unbelievably bashed about. The chase through and up, on a building site, leaping on and off cranes at stomach-lurching heights, is almost unbearable as they both smash repeatedly into the unforgiving metal of the cranes etc. This is a really tough opening, and the tension rarely lets up.

It’s a great relief when there is a quiet moment of dialogue so the audience can get its breath back, and to have the story presented, but it’s not for long. Craig next has a fuel tanker to deal with and there is plenty of great stunt driving here, a sick-making fight with the driver, and enough screeching and skidding to make any lad happy.

Casting is excellent with Vesper Lynd as the girl he falls for. The dialogue is excellent between the two, and a relationship of equals is set up. Bond girls have gone from Pussy Galore, smart and beautiful, then been airheads, just bodies, as we moved through the decades of feminism and post-feminism to become quasi-men and not credible women. Vesper brings us back to the essential woman by being bright, capable and yet feminine, and more likely to be identified with by a female audience than one who shoots machine guns and karate kicks her way through the film. However, the pre-sex scene in the hospital room looks ludicrously uncomfortable and unexpectedly rough, as Vesper and Bond crash into things, and fall hard onto the floor. The actors in this film must be black and blue. This terribly uncomfortable looking sex scene follows the exquisitely tender moment, in the shower scene, which is deeply moving. I want to see this film again, soon, it’s compulsive.

I have only one query – Vesper has the bank account number, Bond has the password. The money gets wired to the bank. It doesn’t arrive. There’s no explanation for the way the double cross with the money happens, timing wise. If it got put into the wrong account in the first place, that would account for it, but in the chronology of the story, I can’t see it. Pay attention on this point. I can’t fault the film otherwise, and I am a dedicated Bond fantasist. The dialogue between M and Bond is interesting, and points up his isolation and a communication problem which is like a marriage; he comes to her twice, to speak to her; each time she bawls him out but does not hear what he has come to say. Both remain ignorant of each other's designs and desires. I really liked the way the Bond motifs were regarded but played down. He orders a different drink but, when offered the usual ‘shaken not stirred’ line Craig says ‘do I look as if I give a damn’, very funny. And his line ‘the name’s Bond. James Bond’ is saved for the final clip. Classy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HARRIET. Dir. Kasi Lemmons. 2019

Astonishing true story of early freedom fighter, Harriet Tubman, enslaved in the Southern states of America. Despite her marriage to a freeborn African-American, she was unable to protect any of their hoped-for children from being born into that same slavery, and being owned by the farm proprietor. Her overpowering sense of injustice compelled her to act. She escapes, and eventually becomes one of America’s great heroes. Her audacity is astonishing, the level of courage she sustained, her extraordinary tenacity and physical endurance, not to mention cunning and excellent planning. One of those qualities would be worthy of high praise but she is exceptional for having all of them, created by her determination to rescue her family and then other captives. She was responsible for the escape of almost 300 slaves Her religious faith was absolute and she felt guided by God to help others, aided by Abolitionists and free African-Americans. Filmed in glorious colour, with deft

STYX. Dir. Wolfgang Fischer. 2018

Watching Styx is an uncomfortable experience throughout, and a film that raises many questions. The film outline has told us exactly what to expect so there’s no surprise when Rike spots the stricken vessel overloaded with refugees, after she has been happily sailing, reading, enjoying her solitude, and anticipating reaching the scientifically created paradise. Rike (Susanne Wolff) is an emergency doctor working in Gibraltar who has set sail on a solo voyage to Ascension Island, part of the British Overseas Territory. Previously barren land, the British introduced trees and non-indigenous planting; now there is lush bamboo and the Green Mountain (cloud) Forest, and she is intrigued by the idea of this fully functioning artificial ecosystem created by Charles Darwin, Joseph Hooker (explorer and botanist) and the Royal Navy from around 1843. Darwin’s Theory of Evolution describes the process of natural selection and survival of the fittest yet, in creating the self-sustaining and

SELL OUT WEEKEND: ADVENTURE TRAVEL FILM FESTIVAL 2014

What moment would you pick as the standout moment in a weekend of adventure travel films, workshops and presentations camping and bush craft, organised by Lois Pryce and Austin Vince ? It’s a tough call. You may have been baffled by Tim Cope and Chris Hatherley’s fourteen month trip from Russia, across Serbia and Mongolia, to Beijing, enduring cold, hunger, exhaustion and frostbite. The two twenty year old guys from Australia shared a tent, their sleeping and waking hours, and the arduous journey in ‘ Off The Rails’ (2001). Maybe you were impressed by the nomadic Bakhtiari people in the 1976 film ‘ People of the Wind ,’ filmed by Anthony Howarth, making the annual migration across the Iranian mountains, leading their flock from Summer to Winter pasture.  With speaking much, without visible signs of communication or affection, the families are individually focussed on their roles: small children carry their younger siblings, lambs or puppies, colts or calves, along hazardou